<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: basecamp vs. activeCollab</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fromdelhi.com/2006/12/27/basecamp-vs-activecollab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fromdelhi.com/2006/12/27/basecamp-vs-activecollab/</link>
	<description>Every.Dog has_a :blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Kershaw</title>
		<link>http://www.fromdelhi.com/2006/12/27/basecamp-vs-activecollab/#comment-2787</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kershaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fromdelhi.com/2006/12/27/basecamp-vs-activecollab/#comment-2787</guid>
		<description>I thought this too when I started getting notifications with links not text... but then I realised it forces me to authenticate myself with AC before I can read the message/comment/task - which in some environments might be important.

However I think this should be optional - I'm using AC to plan a school exchange, so data sensitivity isn't a problem.

John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this too when I started getting notifications with links not text&#8230; but then I realised it forces me to authenticate myself with AC before I can read the message/comment/task - which in some environments might be important.</p>
<p>However I think this should be optional - I&#8217;m using AC to plan a school exchange, so data sensitivity isn&#8217;t a problem.</p>
<p>John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roj Niyogi</title>
		<link>http://www.fromdelhi.com/2006/12/27/basecamp-vs-activecollab/#comment-2040</link>
		<dc:creator>Roj Niyogi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fromdelhi.com/2006/12/27/basecamp-vs-activecollab/#comment-2040</guid>
		<description>Manik

Indeed Basecamp has some intuitively more appealing features then ActiveCollab - and it's not like the features are that difficult to implement (and be made available as options).  

For example - the email notification really should have the content of a message embedded within the email itself (but doesn't).  

(Plus, the sheer size of fonts in AC should be larger; again, making it a preference would work just fine.)

Happy New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manik</p>
<p>Indeed Basecamp has some intuitively more appealing features then ActiveCollab - and it&#8217;s not like the features are that difficult to implement (and be made available as options).  </p>
<p>For example - the email notification really should have the content of a message embedded within the email itself (but doesn&#8217;t).  </p>
<p>(Plus, the sheer size of fonts in AC should be larger; again, making it a preference would work just fine.)</p>
<p>Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

